“When a white nation, officially openly racist, changes itself within half a century into a modern cosmopolitan multi-ethnic and culturally tolerant one, any coloured observer would be pleased. Since many, if not most, nations contain an admixture of peoples offering a diversity of beliefs, values, traditions, and ethnic origins and histories, there was little danger in Australia now joining the Family of Man.
However, the rate of change in the composition of the nation must enable even an evolving host people to adapt and, hopefully, to reach an accord of tolerance promising acceptance – both within themselves and between host and migrant. In their felt need to expand the population, as well as to further diversify the immigrant intake, have recent Australian governments introduced the seeds of tribal contention and conflict?
My experience of Australia’s racism and tribalism is indicative of how far we have come in terms of tolerance. The credit for much of this improvement must go to our school teachers, their students, and those Anglo-Aussies who reached out to us foreigners; as well as to us, the immigrants.
From the earliest times, groups or collectives of human beings would have necessarily fought one another to obtain sustenance or resources. Or, learn to work together for a common cause. Because an urge to dominate and thence to control (an inheritance from our faunal, that is, animal, ancestors) is found in some members of humanity, conflict is often unavoidable. Competition for resources (including women) would lead to inter-tribal clashes. Tribes may also split through the young bull taking on the old bull, or through an alpha-male going on the rampage.
Traditionally, an extended family (one sharing a common ancestor) would co-exist with other extended families … … A number of co-operative coherent clans would represent a tribe. A tribe would look after, fight for, its interests with vigour and cunning.
A typical example would be the Roman Catholics of Australia, mainly of Irish descent. Their church would do everything it could to keep its flock separate from the Protestants; this included a separate education system. They would practice discrimination, even as they complained about being discriminated against. This was the divided Australia I came into in the late 1940s. Yet, both sides of this divide had one significant attitude in common; they were, in the main, tribal and racist.
The shared religious prejudice may now have been dissipated or become tactically subterranean. There is some evdence of an on-going strategy for supremacy by the Roman Catholic hierarchy.”
(The modern tribes of Western democracy – the political parties – are pussy cats compared against the religion-based tribes all over the world, including the nations of the West. The asserted superiority of this or another religious sect over other sects is positively pathetic, is it not? Is there not a single destination for all of us, no matter the route taken?
Happily, the attempted separation of human beings by skin colour by European colonialism is doomed to fail. Most of the globe is coloured; the so-called whites of Europe apparently represent only about 15% of humanity, with this percentage expected to fall to 10% by about 2050. A warmer surface tint in the hitherto white nations also seems to be on the way, in the way European soccer football teams have gone (without any detriment to the sport).
The extracts above from ‘On racism and tribalism’ in ‘Musings at Death’s Door’ cover these issues.)
RAJA ARASA RATNAM 