In the 1990s there was a terrible display of prejudice against the Aboriginal people in Australia by a gaggle of conservatives, ‘racists,’ and sundry fellow-travellers. The trigger was a ‘native title’ claim by Torres Straits Islanders and Aboriginal Australians. The motivation was ‘whitefella’ supremacy fused with overt greed.
The following extract is from my book ‘Hidden Footprints of Unity’ – refer chapter 3 ‘To have a dream.’ Unity went out the door when the indigenous peoples sought minimal cultural rights, without any threat to others.
“A white female pastoralist was reported in the late 1990s to have been fearful when her property was the subject of a native title claim by an Aboriginal community. She thought that, if successful, the Aborigines would simply take possession of her property. After she had met the claimants, she knew otherwise. Why had not the government or the media made this clear? Were they in cahoots with the powerful pastoralist lobby groups? It seems so.
She learnt that the Aborigines’ aim was co-existence. They only wanted access to significant sites to conduct cultural activities for young people. She was quoted in the press as saying: ‘When sheep and cattle were moved in, the land the indigenous people lived off was badly affected. They had to find other ways to survive, and the problems were compounded by the aggressive acts of the pastoralists and the local white authorities. During the 1920s and 1930s indigenes were herded together in designated Aboriginal reserves, with little shelter and no water. The communities were split up, their culture fragmented. They gravitated towards the edges of towns … ended up outcasts, on the fringes of white society’.
Where politicians had promised ‘certainty’ to the pastoralists, she reportedly felt that she had been kept in the dark, misled, and betrayed. She was further quoted as follows: “… people like me were being used as tools, in what was obviously a political agenda being used to continue the hurt and dispossession of people who have been hurt their whole lives”; and “… there are people fanning the flames and spreading misinformation”.
She also quoted the Prime Minister of the day as claiming publicly that it would be possible for 78% of Australia to be under ‘veto’ (for development) by Aborigines. Has the government resiled from this ridiculous claim?
er comment to that was: “I’ve no doubt that most Australians would have believed him. If I hadn’t informed myself, I’d have believed him as well”. Her final comments are noteworthy. “I did not hunt the (Aborigines) off their land: but what I have today I have partly because others did. If I inherited the fruits of the pioneers’ achievements, I also inherited a debt to those they dispossessed.”
Ha! Tell that to the beneficiaries of the nations created brutally by immigrants to the Americas and New Zealand.
That says it all. And what a wonderful human being — a beacon of light. This enlightened white lady has reached out to the Aboriginal people. She is also educating people in her situation about the need to work with Aboriginal people. As asked by a respected academic in another, but comparable, context: “If lying comes to seem an acceptable political means to a worthwhile end, what will prevent democracy degenerating into a struggle between elites whose relationship to the electorate goes no deeper than the conduct of an auction …?. In any such auctions, the Aborigines will not be viable bidders.”
The attitudes of prominent politicians and pastoralists was disgusting, considering the way Australia postures and pontificates about human rights – always as applying to other nations, of course. What was displayed was the ugly Australian and his rapacious offsiders.
I will write about the background issues in a later post.
RAJA ARASA RATNAM 