One reads, again and again, that tropical conditions applied in the Arctic. I can even recall my elders talking about how the onset of cold conditions in Siberia brought an inflow of people into Central Asia.
Recently, in one of my posts, I wrote about the claim that the continents of Earth as we know them were once oriented East-West, instead of North-South as at present; and that this shift would have taken Siberia into the Arctic zone. The trigger for this massive (and quite improbable) re-alignment was the claimed passage of Phaeton (an assumed fragment of supernova Vela) through the solar system: the culmination of the whole episode being the Universal Flood, dated about 13,000 years ago.
A relatively recent article by Kyle Bennett on pole wandering (refer http://pathofthepole.yolasite.com) in the following website https://grahamhancock.com/bennettk1 referred to displacement of Earth’s spin axis (or pole shift or wandering); and that this phenomenon was referred to in ancient myths and historical texts.
The following is an extract from Bennett’s above article.
“Back in the Victorian Era, more and more evidence was turning up that the Arctic was tropical not too long ago. This has been proved beyond doubt in recent years by modern explorations in this Ocean. It was tropical in the Eocene (about 50 million years ago), and was subtropical a mere 3 million years ago. But modern geologists simply refuse to even consider the possibility that the Arctic was actually near the equator in those times (although many accept polar wandering occurred much earlier, in the Palaeozoic Era). And they ridicule those who consider it, calling them cranks, conspiracy theorists, etc., etc. So what did Evans say?
‘Without in the slightest degree undervaluing other causes which may lead to climatal changes, I think that possibly we may have here a vera causa such as would account for extreme variations from a Tropical to an Arctic temperature at the same spot, in a simpler and more satisfactory manner than any other hypothesis.’
And it is now known – as modern exploration has discovered – that the Arctic flipped between a glacial and almost tropical climate a number of times during the Eocene, as well as later on. So what does that suggest? Evans was even more confident that his theory was correct when discussing the remains of tropical plants found in the Arctic:
‘The former existence of cold in what are now warm latitudes might, and probably did in part, arise from other causes than a change in the axis of rotation, but no other hypothesis can well account for the existence of traces of an almost tropical vegetation within the Arctic circle…..
….they seem to afford conclusive evidence of a change in the position of the pole since the period at which they grew, as such vegetation must be considered impossible in so high a latitude.’”
Comment: Did Siberia move into the Arctic about 13,000 years ago?